What is the inaccurate statement concerning arson fires at taxpayer structures?

The statement that the means and methods of the arsonist are limited is inaccurate because arsonists can utilize a wide range of techniques and materials to start fires. Evidence from various investigations shows that arson methods can be creative and diverse; perpetrators often adapt their strategies based on circumstances or desired outcomes. This variability in approach is significant in understanding arson cases and highlights the unpredictability and complexity of arson as a criminal act.

In contrast, the other statements accurately reflect key aspects of arson investigations. The motives for committing arson can indeed be complex, involving factors such as financial gain, revenge, or even psychological issues. Fire patterns generated during an arson can suggest the use of accelerants, aiding investigators in determining the cause of the fire. Furthermore, the methods employed by arsonists can vary greatly, reflecting their individual skill sets and intentions. This nuance in methodologies plays an essential role in analyzing and solving arson cases.